Who is your customer?

From Seth’s blog:

The question: Who is your customer?

It’s not obvious.

Zappos is a classic customer service company, and their customer is the person who buys the shoes.

Nike, on the other hand, doesn’t care very much at all about the people who buy the shoes, or even the retailers. They care about the athletes (often famous) that wear the shoes, sometimes for money. They name buildings after these athletes, court them, erect statues…

As more and more companies embrace digital as an integrated part of their core activities (and thus their brand identity), the question of Who is our customer? is becoming increasingly crucial for any brand to ask itself. Not just in wide strokes, but down to the details.

Just as digital signifies a significant shift in corporate identity, it may also, and often does, signify an equally if not more significant shift in customer segments. Going digital, you might suddenly be reaching, and falling into the consideration sets of, entirely new audiences. And with those new audiences come new customer behaviors to understand and react to.

One example that comes to mind to illustrate this is that of beauty brands, who’ve traditionally employed push strategies in getting their products directly to the customer by dictating which looks are currently in vogue. The arrival of the Internet and the subsequential rise of self-made beauty experts and consumer-driven beauty trends are ending that. Today’s beauty consumer has access to an unlimited supply of guidance, advice, support and inspiration online; she’s no longer restricted to the beauty parlor, the department store beauty counter or the fashion magazines. And if she likes, she’s got an array of platforms under her fingertips on which to make herself a trendsetter.

To remain competitive in this new reality, beauty brands do not only need to figure out how to respond to their customers’ online activities (ignoring your brand fans is a fundamentally bad idea), but also how to be locally relevant across the markets they’ve entered – because going online means going global, and each regional pocket of the Internet has its own quirks and twists. What works in the US may not work in China, and what you see in China may be (yet) unheard on in the US.

Do you know where your customers spend their time online? Do you understand the needs and interests that bring them together? If not, you better do your homework before the competition swoops in and makes your customers theirs.

Systems Thinking: Lessons From The Fifth Discipline Fieldbook by Senge, Kleiker, Roberts, Ross and Smith

After mental models comes systems thinking.

I’m very excited to share a brand spanking new deck with the world today. Amy Rae and I have summed up our thoughts on a second discipline from Peter M. Senge’s five guiding disciplines for learning organizations: Systems Thinking. If you missed our first deck on Mental Models, you can find it here.

Why should you care about systems thinking, or systems for that matter? Because systems are everywhere. If we understand them a little bit better, we’ll understand the world, and by extension ourselves, a little bit better. This is especially important to anyone who’s tasked making decisions – any decision you make will be more smarter, better and have more longevity if you know how to read your surroundings.

Why do we care? Because any great systems thinker is a great strategist.

Y Combinator As An Anthropology Experiment

I found this comment from Aaron Levie, founder of Box.net, interesting. In an interview with Business Insider, he comments on seed-stage startup funding firm Y Combinator:

It’s an interesting anthropology experiment. When you’re 22 years old or 25 years old — the Y Combinator demographic — you have no context for the enterprise. If you’re in your early 20s and you’re hanging out with a bunch of other people in their early 20s, nobody has a sense of the kinds of problems that real “workers” run into every day. They’re running into a completely different set of problems like “what’s the party going on right now that I should be going to? What are my friends looking at on the Internet that I want to read? How do I share photos and videos?” That’s their frame of reference for life.

While I think this comment is overly generalizing, it made me think that perhaps in 5-10 years’ time we’ll see a wave of interesting enterprise-focused startup ventures from former Y Combinator participants (once they’ve gotten the real-life enterprise experience piece down). But then I realized that this really – and quite obviously – applies more broadly.

Y Combinators are problem-solvers. In some sense, they’re one of the best coordinated groups of problem-solvers of their generation, a generation that is one of the first to have grown up with digital technologies permeating their existence. They’re naturally going to have a different perspective on the world than older generations. One might read Levie’s comment as a criticism of the type of utility that typically comes out of Y Combinator startups. Perhaps that is the case – but what you can extrapolate from Levie’s examples is that Y Combinator participants really apply a social lens to the world and craft solutions that (hope to) bring us social utility.

Seeing that lens – and it’s a powerful one – coming to life on a large scale across other sections of society and bringing new incarnations of social utility with it will be truly exciting.

About

Swedish ex-pat, living in NYC, working as a digital strategist at Undercurrent. The thoughts and opinions expressed here are mine and not representative of my employer or any of the clients with whom I've had the pleasure to work with. If you'd like to connect, you can reach me info [at] jbeltowska.com. Thanks for reading!

140 Characters

#1337 RT @jbeltowska: Behold UC's first official hackathon! http://t.co/Yh4yuMXF
5 months ago
Behold UC's first official hackathon! http://t.co/eWbVNppY
5 months ago
Smart stuff. RT @jbeltowska Blogged: "Six Provocations For Big Data" - A Summary bit.ly/oSOkh1
5 months ago